BloJJ

Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • Natasha en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Cb en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Dan Brown Freak en Spanish mostly pissed off at Dan Brown's Digital Fortress
  • Jack en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Anónimo en About conference poster design and defense
  • Hendo en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • TML en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Anonymous en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • RonS en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • miss en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Kottke
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog
    Blogging in the wind, Víctor R. Ruiz's blog


    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Blogalia

    Stats
    Inicio > Historias > The waning art of bullfighting in Spain

    The waning art of bullfighting in Spain

    Toro de OsborneIt's been all over the place, so you probably know already that the autonomous region of Catalonia has banished bullfighting (or rather bullring bullfighting, since other forms of figthing, or teasing, bulls are still permitted, or even encouraged.
    A lot has been made of this; in fact, in Spain we make a lot of noise and fighting and arguing on just about everything. In fact, a single bullring was active in Catalonia and mostly for tourists. Bullfights have not been shown for a long time on national TV (but they thrive on pay channels and some regional government-run stations), and in fact, just a few fiestas took place every year, with a bunch of bulls killed (and some bullfighters maimed).
    So, what's the big deal? A few thousands persons will not be able to take the underground and attend a celebration they like, and a few tourists will be pissed off because they weren't able to see, live, a bull killed. Because just a few people, and mostly of the older persuasion, like bullfigthing. Most young people would be seen in a bullring just for a concert or in any of the many pubs that have been built around them. Myself, I've never been in a corrida for years, and will never voluntarily go to one or watch one on TV. In fact, I'm horrorized by the gruesome pictures of gored bullfighters that show up, from time to time, on the first page of web dailies, where you can't help but watch them. I won't take anybody in my family to such a show, so the next generation is not going to change in their tastes.
    And why is it so? First, a corrida is boring. It takes three long hours, it takes place in an uncomfortable stone bench (helped by little pillows), it is expensive unless you want to endure sun for three solid hours, and if you go just for the bulls, you're probably going to be disappointed. People go with friends and use it as a venue for staging a party, sometimes looking at the bullring when they are warned by the bugles or by the yells of people.
    And then, it's a complicated art. Most people distinguish between standing and kneeling passes, and that's that. Those who know (less and less) are able to name every single motion, and of course understand styles and patterns and types of bulls. But since there's a generation gap between the previous generation and this one, the numbers of those are dwindling quite fast.
    That all means that in a generation there will be only a few bullrings operating. It all boils down to economics, and if the managers can't obtain enough money they will just shut down and use bullrings as movie theaters or as historic museums. Outside the big cities, it's increasingly difficult to pay goot bullfighters, which are expensive. And the lack of a quality show will feed back on itself, making the few people who understand and like it abandon the plazas.
    That said, it does not make any sense to forbid something that will probably die by itself, and not in the far future. If you look at the big picture, it makes even less sense. But here you go, it is forbidden now, which will probably lead to a renaissance of the fiesta and an increase of interest due to the well known "green door" effect. Red doors, in this case.
    Etiquetas: , , ,

    2010-08-02 11:57 | 4 Comment(s) | Filed in

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia http://blojj.blogalia.com//trackbacks/67464

    Comentarios

    1
    De: Anónimo Fecha: 2010-08-02 15:42

    "No tiene sentido prohibir lo que va a morir por sí solo". ¿Por qué?

    Sin entrar a valorar si las corridas son moralmente malas o no, la afirmación no es válida.



    2
    De: JJ Fecha: 2010-08-02 16:39

    Simplemente, porque es mucho mejor que la ciudadanía alcance una conclusión por si misma en vez de imponérselo, lo que, al fin y al cabo, coarta su libertad.



    3
    De: Anónimo Fecha: 2010-08-03 13:52

    La redacción de leyes por el poder legislativo es la manifestación de la voluntad del pueblo soberano. ¿Qué significa alcanzar una conclusión por sí misma, si no es eso? De esto va el juego, de imponernos unas normas de convivencia.

    Como imagino que no propugnas abolir el Estado de Derecho y que la ciudadanía actúe bien llegando a conclusiones por sí misma, no entiendo por qué en este caso te parece que no tiene sentido legislar.

    A no ser que las corridas de toros no te supongan ningún problema moral, en cuyo caso estaríamos hablando en otros términos.



    4
    De: JJ Fecha: 2010-08-03 16:58

    El estado de derecho confiere legalidad, que no legitimidad. Suprimir un derecho de una minoría es legal, pero no tiene por qué ser legítimo. Y más cuando claramente lo que se ataca es el derecho en sí, y no el problema que se supone que defiende (los derechos de los animales). En ese sentido, el "juego" no va de "imponer" unas normas de "convivencia", sino de que la ciudadanía asuma esas normas de "convivencia" como propias. Lo que, eventualmente, iban a hacer tarde o temprano. Más tarde ahora, que va a tener el encanto de lo prohibido.



    Nombre
    Correo-e
    URL
    Dirección IP: 23.20.157.174 (f8ae440b99)
    Comentario

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia