BloJJ

Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • Natasha en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Cb en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Dan Brown Freak en Spanish mostly pissed off at Dan Brown's Digital Fortress
  • Jack en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Anónimo en About conference poster design and defense
  • Hendo en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • TML en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Anonymous en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • RonS en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • miss en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Kottke
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog
    Blogging in the wind, Víctor R. Ruiz's blog


    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Blogalia

    Stats
    Inicio > Historias > Time on Madrid bombing's verdict

    Time on Madrid bombing's verdict

    Time, and probably the north-american public opinion, have been upset by the Madrid March 11th bombing verdict. Time has published a couple of articles about it. In Madrid Verdicts: Was Justice Done?, by Lisa Abend, there are two main points: the light sentences received by many convicts, and, second, the fact that the verdict makes no mention to Al Qaeda. And in the second article, Spain v. Jihad, by the same author, it mainly says that the police are taking a tough stance against jihadism, but that stance has not arrived yet to the judges:
    Spanish security forces have greatly reformed themselves in the past three years--increasing staffing and reorganizing in order to connect the disparate dots of jihadist conspiracies. Spain's judges would do well to learn those lessons.

    That statement is completely and absolutely wrong. Judges are bound to the evidence that the police brings them. If police is unable to come up with hard evidence, judges will not be able to connect any dot.
    In the first article, she also quotes an Spanish expert on jihadism, Fernando Reinares, from Instituto Elcano, who was an adviser to the current government until the current interior minister arrived:
    "In Spain, the tendency is toward conservative legal reasoning among judges," says Reinares. "With ETA, they're accustomed to only using direct, proven facts to convict. But international terrorism doesn't work that way — they leave different kinds of evidence. To convict, you have to take indirect evidence into account, especially when, as in this case, there is so much of it."

    Well, pardon me, but that "indirect evidence" is called circumstancial and can lead to the electric chair in the USA, but it usually guarantees acquittal in the Spanish Justice system, fortunately.
    At stake is the fact that the March bombing can be used by US hawks as another evidence on the war of terrorism. But we couldn't care less: it's a bombing, it's terrorism, and it's been convicted according to Spanish law. It does not bring closure, never will, but it's the best courts and police can offer.

    2007-11-03 12:19 | 3 Comment(s) | Filed in Politics

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia http://blojj.blogalia.com//trackbacks/53197

    Comentarios

    1
    De: rvr Fecha: 2007-11-03 17:30

    I'm amazed by those writings. US and UK did changes in their legislation to "fight" terrorism, and many of that changes were done against civil rights. But no change was needed in Spain, no civil rights were supressed. IMHO, the Spanish standard of Justice is closer to the ideals. In US and UK, they seem more tempted to bring revenge than justice to their legal system.



    2
    De: JJ Fecha: 2007-11-03 17:43

    Exactly. That's the whole point of justice, if it brings reduction in human rights, makes no sense.



    3
    De: Marcelo Fecha: 2007-11-07 03:58

    Hi, JJ!

    My friend, their brand is crisis!

    That so-called "War Against Terrorism" seems as some kind of primitive religion which needs appealing to such, let's say, apocalyptical statements and all those groundless arguments to convince the US public opinion to send their soldiers into war.

    It seems that the good old Mr. Eisenhower was totally right when talking upon the US military-industrial complex.

    Hasta la vista!

    Marcelo



    Nombre
    Correo-e
    URL
    Dirección IP: 54.144.29.233 (3ba58cc300)
    Comentario

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia