BloJJ

Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • uali20 en Cloning part of a local repository
  • bella en Riddles in Kafka on the shore
  • Darel Long en Ants and roaches at Deneubourg's lab
  • robert en Äppärätti in Super Sad True Love Story
  • crystlfnleys en Äppärätti in Super Sad True Love Story
  • robert en Cloning part of a local repository
  • christina en Äppärätti in Super Sad True Love Story
  • bella en About conference poster design and defense
  • read reviews en About conference poster design and defense
  • website en About conference poster design and defense
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Kottke
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog
    Blogging in the wind, Víctor R. Ruiz's blog


    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Blogalia

    Stats
    Inicio > Historias > The googlization of science

    The googlization of science

    Science has changed with the introduction of search engines; usually for the good (it's easier to find stuff related to what you're working in), but also in some other ways that can't straighforwardly be labeled good or bad.
    For instance, one of the ways of being aware of the state of the art is searching Google Scholar. The criteria for ranking results is not always clear. For instance, searching for evolutionary computation returns as first hit a paper by Schwefel, which is an overview written in 93. Excellent paper, but it has less citations than the next, which is a book by Fogel, or the third, another edited book. I would consider neither of them, right now, the best reference, or even primer, for evolutionary computation, notwithstanding their number of cites.
    Which brings me to the googlization of science: there's no way of establishing a ranking of the quality of papers (although the number of cites is a good enough approximation), which means that, in its absence, paper authors will look for what search engine optimizers usually look for: term density, using keywords and metainformation, papers acting as "link farms", semantic markup for emphasis, and so on... it's easier to trick a machine than to trick a group of persons, and if previously people published just for having a line added to their resumé, now publishing for increasing their paper pagerank might also be a concern.
    Is a scientific pagerank possible? It might, and it could help, but meanwhile, there's a market niche to be filled (scientific paper ranking optimization) and it will no doubt be filled by someone.

    2007-05-25 12:07 | 2 Comment(s) | Filed in

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia http://blojj.blogalia.com//trackbacks/49717

    Comentarios

    1
    De: Amir massoud Farahmand Fecha: 2007-06-12 21:11

    I have a suggestion for this ranking problem.
    Personally, I don't like the idea of ranking people, papers, or anything like that!
    But it seems that for practical purposes, we sometime need to do it in a way or other.
    What about this idea?!
    Give some *value* to authors of the paper. These values can help the ranking of the paper. If a paper is not even cited so much, but the authors is one of those high-valued person, let's move the paper up a little.
    This value can depends on many things: number of previous citations the author has, or even better, number of citations the author has in the same field of the paper.

    The intuition behind this idea is that many people usually choose a paper to read not by the number of citations, but by the authority of that figure in the field (which will be know to everyone whom are working in any field for a while).



    2
    De: JJ Fecha: 2007-06-12 22:16

    That would be something like a "personal pagerank". But how can you measure that value, if it's not via papers written?



    Nombre
    Correo-e
    URL
    Dirección IP: 54.82.56.95 (f427478dc3)
    Comentario
    ¿Cuánto es: mil + uno?

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia