BloJJ

Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • buy facebook comments uk en I have to publish something in this blog
  • buy facebook comments uk en I have to publish something in this blog
  • Instagram Views en About conference poster design and defense
  • buy cheap facebook comments en About conference poster design and defense
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Anónimo en End of the line for a loser
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Kottke
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog
    Blogging in the wind, Víctor R. Ruiz's blog


    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories


    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
    Blogalia

    Stats
    Inicio > Historias > What is ref #3 about?

    What is ref #3 about?

    Do you really read the papers you cite?:
    We report a method of estimating what percentage of people who cited a paper had actually read it. The method is based on a stochastic modeling of the citation process that explains empirical studies of misprint distributions in citations (which we show follows a Zipf law). Our estimate is only about 20% of citers read the original.

    2005-12-22 22:08 | 5 Comment(s) | Filed in

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia http://blojj.blogalia.com//trackbacks/35929

    Comentarios

    1
    De: fernand0 Fecha: 2005-12-23 09:55

    I've been cited by authors who clearly had not read the paper (or, they read it, and they forgot it :) ).



    2
    De: JJ Fecha: 2005-12-23 10:27

    I have been _reviewed_ by authors who clearly had not read the paper...



    3
    De: fernand0 Fecha: 2005-12-23 10:28

    me too :)



    4
    De: Heimy Fecha: 2005-12-23 11:32

    Nice. That would explain why some papers make it into certain publications x)

    We're all doomed!



    5
    De: Algernon Fecha: 2005-12-23 11:41

    More on NewScientist :-)



    Nombre
    Correo-e
    URL
    Dirección IP: 54.80.180.248 (08b030e106)
    Comentario

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia