Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • ahhhhhhh en Problem solved: disabled wireless Internet
  • ODOM en Problems with git and Google Code?
  • Ricardo en Problems with git and Google Code?
  • DAUGHERTY en Problems with git and Google Code?
  • TRAVIS en Problems with git and Google Code?
  • Frenzy Sportswear en About conference poster design and defense
  • TRAVIS en Problems with git and Google Code?
  • en Algorithm::Evolutionary 0.62_2 released
  • en First sightings of the R word
  • a en Spanish blogosphere in Wired
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog
    Blogging in the wind, Víctor R. Ruiz's blog

    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

    Inicio > Historias > Counting beans or counting bytes

    Counting beans or counting bytes

    With a headline as juicy as How much information? 2003 (found at slashdot and some other sites), no wonder everybody and their mother is commenting on it. Mainly wondering how come they have produced a complete CD and then some, and not have noticed, because every person in the world has produced 800 MBytes of new information.
    I think that study is fundamentally wrong. Information can't be counted in the same way as beans or sprockets or whatnots. If I take a digital picture, I'm "producing" 3 Mbytes, all by myself, but so what? I could write a 3-thousand pages novel, and producing the same. Not all bytes are born the same. So, what sense does it make to count how many bytes have been "produced"? For instance, one of the reasons of the increase in byte production is that lots of people are using digital cameras and camera phones. What, old analog pictures don't have bytes? Or they contain bytes only if they are scanned and put in digital form?
    I can't contest their figures, they're probably accurate to the best of their knowledge, but what sense do they make? The only issue I see here is that digital media is more popular than it was 3 years ago. And it will be even more.
    Meanwhile, I see a big business oportunity here. Huge amounts of money could be made by offering the information-production deprived to fill their quota for them. I'll do it, 0.1 € cent per byte. Satisfaction guaranteed, or your money back.

    2003-11-01 01:20 | 0 Comment(s) | Filed in

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia


    Dirección IP: (85f229ef82)
    ¿Cuánto es: diez mil + uno?

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia