Adventures of a multidimensional freak

This is Juan Julián Merelo Guervós English-language blog. He teaches computer science at the University of Granada, in southern Spain. Come back here to read about politics, technology, with a new twist

Latest comments

  • seomaster en Spanish blogosphere in Wired
  • ali en In Trondheim for CEC 09
  • sdsd en Losing my religion (the subject of religion in Spanish schools)
  • Eugene Williamson en Stand on Zanzibar
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en Kohonants in action
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en So you still want a summer internship somewhere, right?
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en So you still want a summer internship somewhere, right?
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en So you still want a summer internship somewhere, right?
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en So you still want a summer internship somewhere, right?
  • Abhishek Dey Roy en So you still want a summer internship somewhere, right?
  • Blogs Out There

    Nelson Minar's Blog
    Jeremy Zawodny's Blog
    Complexes, Carlos Gershenson's blog
    IlliGAL, Genetic Algorithms blog

    Atalaya, my Spanish language blog
    Geneura@Wordpress, our research group's blog.
    My home page

    Old stories

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

    Inicio > Historias > 19th century scientific publishing

    19th century scientific publishing

    Even as we are going into the 21st century, scientific publishing hasn't changed much. You still have to write paper in two dimensions, black on white, submit it to a print journal (or a congress), and then wait for ages before it's published (or rejected).
    There's been some change on the journals: now most journals accept papers electronically, and they publish it also on the web afterwards, most usually in a pay-per-view basis. I'm not going to get into the ethics of this, it's just the way it is now. The only problem is that the only added value to the web version is hyperlinks to referenced papers (if they are on the same site).
    But things could change quite a lot more. For starters, scientific results are inherently hyperlinked: there should be some universal way of referring to a paper, so that an hyperlink to that paper could be automatically inserted in the final version of the paper. Then, the web version should be the default version, not a kind of afterthought; besides, web-only journals, nowadays, aren't really very well considered, which makes no sense, since a print version can be obtained straight away. Just inserting another dimension by hyperlinking would make researching a subject much more straighforward.
    But there's also something missing in that picture, and it's also something quite inherent to science itself: reproducibility of results. Most of the times, results appear in tables, but they are almost impossible to reproduce (at least, in most computer science papers). The program that produces it uses to be homebrew, or has some part of it homebrew, and it's not available either.
    Why not making datasets and all program sources needed to reach the published result also available with the paper, and, if possible, with a sensible license, GPL-like? It would make much more difficult to duplicate efforts, and, besides, scientists would strive to make science really available to others. Nowadays, you see the same results published over and over, because, sometimes, there's a lot of effort invested in reprogramming an algorithm, or typing down a dataset.
    Then, once we have everything together, program+dataset+text, putting everything into a common format would be the way to go, so that searches would be much easier. It's easy now to make references apart from the rest of the text, and sometimes even abstract, but using an XML format for publishing would allow easy parsing of the text, and even easy comparison of results. Comparing several results would be as easy as making an XPath query. In fact, there's such a thing, STMML: scientific, technical and medical markup language, but I'm not sure how popular it is (probably next to nil; I'd never heard about it).
    I guess there's still a long way to go, meanwhile, just inserting hyperlinks in the papers we publish and making source and datasets available can be an intermediate solution.

    2003-10-27 01:39 | 6 Comment(s) | Filed in

    Referencias (TrackBacks)

    URL de trackback de esta historia


    De: Ctugha Fecha: 2003-10-27 04:57

    Yeah. For some stuff there is really hard to find the original data and soft. For experiments it´s even harder than for simulations (anybody interested in taking a look to the non-analyzed data?). Actually, I have even seen "benchmarks" of models of reading (cognitive science, you know), a trend that began with the Coltheart´s DRC paper. After that, benchmarking the original models with the same data is beginning to be more common in psychology.

    De: JJ Fecha: 2003-10-27 14:51

    For most things, it's almost impossible, even if you ask the original authors. And it should be compulsory.

    De: fernand0 Fecha: 2003-10-27 17:55

    Very good points.

    De: JJ Fecha: 2003-10-27 18:03


    De: Tamilrockers Fecha: 2019-09-26 14:10

    HDhub4u - Download All movies And Tv Shows
    TamilRockers New Link
    TamilRockers - Tamil, Telugu, Hindi Dubbed, Movie Download
    Mp4moviez Download 2019 Latest Hindi Dubbed HD Movies
    DvdVilla Download Latest Bollywood & Hollywood Hindi Dubbed Movies
    Bhojpuri Film
    Movierulz 2019 – Download watch latest Bollywood, Telugu, Hollywood Movies
    Gujarat Ration Card
    PMSBY Full Form
    UP Ration Card Download
    Goa Ration Card List
    Ration Card Assam
    Ration Card
    Punjab Ration Card List
    cg Ration Card List
    Digital Ration Card
    UP Ration Card List

    De: Fecha: 2019-11-15 12:21

    best web hosting
    garmin updates
    Dell printer customer service
    yahoo customer service

    © 2002 - 2008 jmerelo
    Powered by Blogalia